![]() ![]() You may also be better off looking at, or possibly posting to, the TeX stackexchange. If these thoughts don't resolve things, try posting a ‘ minimal working example’. However, the way that the bibliography is loaded can sometimes make it unexpectedly difficult to fiddle with its formatting (as you've discovered, when trying to redefine \uline). We underline a text to make the reader notice some specific words in a document. Emphasis Lists Links and images Code blocks LaTeX Quotes Spoilers Emoji and emoticons Mentions Status messages Global times Tables To-do lists. ![]() ![]() ![]() I don't know if that would be an acceptable solution for you – ie, do you in fact want \emph to be underlined throughout the rest of the document?Īlternatively, if you only want \emph to go back to its original definition for the bibliography, you could try ( ulem docs again) giving the command \normalem before loading the bibliography. LaTeX provides commands for making overlines or underlines, or putting braces over or under some material. Underlining a text is not limited to only showing a website hyperlink. The documentation for the ulem package notes that adding the option when loading the ulem package means that \uline is defined but \emph isn't redefined. One of the features of the ulem package is to redefine \emph so that it uses \uline, so (as is presumably already clear to you) that's why you're getting underline in the bibliography, where text was emphasised before. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |